Key result
A semi-automated workflow predicted 54% and 7% gene editing in striatal and cortical cells, closely matching the observed 54.5% and 9.6% huntingtin gene inactivation in treated mice.
Why the study?
Development of gene therapies for the central nervous system has been hindered by a lack of workflows to quantify transduction efficiency in neural networks and predict therapeutic potential.
A semi-automated workflow accurately predicted AAV transduction efficiency and gene editing outcomes in the corticostriatal network of mouse models of Huntington's disease.
Accurately predicts AAV gene editing in HD mouse corticostriatal networks; hypothesis-generating and leaves clinical translation open.
One obstacle to the development of gene therapies for the central nervous system is the lack of workflows for quantifying transduction efficiency in affected neural networks and ultimately predicting therapeutic potential. We integrated data from a brain cell atlas with 3D or 2D semi-automated quantification of transduced cells in segmented images to predict AAV transduction efficiency in multiple brain regions. We used this workflow to estimate the transduction efficiency of AAV2/rh.10 and AAV2.retro co-injection in the corticostriatal network affected in Huntington's disease. We then validated our pipeline in gene editing experiments targeting both human and mouse huntingtin genes in transgenic and wild-type mice, respectively. Our analysis predicted that 54% of striatal cells and 7% of cortical cells would be edited in highly transduced areas. Remarkably, in the treated animals, huntingtin gene inactivation reached 54.5% and 9.6%, respectively. These results demonstrate the power of this workflow to predict transduction efficiency and the therapeutic potential of gene therapies in the central nervous system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duarte et al. (2023) studied Huntington's disease. AAV2/rh.10 and AAV2.retro co-injection and gene editing was evaluated on Huntingtin gene inactivation in striatal and cortical cells. A semi-automated workflow predicted 54% and 7% gene editing in striatal and cortical cells, closely matching the observed 54.5% and 9.6% huntingtin gene inactivation in treated mice.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: