Why the study?
Does morphological change in the atrial electrogram during Para-Hisian pacing indicate the presence of both accessory pathway and AV node conduction in patients undergoing catheter ablation?
Does morphological change in the atrial electrogram during Para-Hisian pacing indicate the presence of both accessory pathway and AV node conduction in patients undergoing catheter ablation?
Morphological change in the atrial electrogram without overlapping the ventricular electrogram during Para-Hisian pacing is a useful diagnostic indicator for the presence of both accessory pathway and AV node retrograde conduction.
Morphological atrial electrogram changes during Para-Hisian pacing were associated with dual retrograde conduction; leaves open diagnostic utility pending prospective validation.
Para-Hisian pacing (PHP), a pacing method to differentiate between conduction occurring over an accessory pathway (AP) from that over the atrioventricular node (AVN), is assessed essentially by comparing the timing in the atrial electrogams. Morphological change in the atrial electrograms is often observed during PHP, but its significance has not been investigated. Prior to the catheter ablation procedure, PHP was performed in 52 patients with an AP and in 36 patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). The morphological change in the atrial electrograms, which was retrospectively assessed between the His bundle and proximal right bundle branch (HB-RB) captured and non-captured beats, was identified in 15 of 52 patients with an AP and in 26 of 36 patients with AVNRT. The atrial electrogram in the 6 of these 15 AP patients changed its morphology without overlapping the ventricular electrogram. All 6 AP patients exhibited a PHP pattern with the presence of 2 retrograde conduction routes, an AP and the AVN. In the patients demonstrating no morphological change in the atrial electrogram, 33 of 37 AP patients and all 10 AVNRT patients had only one retrograde conduction route. Morphological change in the atrial electrogram without overlapping the ventricular electrogram seems to have diagnostic significance indicating the presence of both AP and AVN conduction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hirao et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: