Key result
Monitoring intermediate endpoints or disease markers in hypertension may provide more accurate individual risk stratification and better evaluation of treatment efficacy over time.
Monitoring intermediate endpoints or disease markers in hypertension may provide accurate individual risk stratification and better evaluation of antihypertensive treatment efficacy over time.
Together with other modifiable cardiovascular risk factors, hypertension heavily contributes to the global burden of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, as well as to the increase in individual absolute cardiovascular risk. Comparison of the effectiveness of different therapies in reducing the incidence of major cardiovascular events has classically required the evaluation of major 'hard' end points. In view of the long natural history of hypertension, however, it appears very useful to monitor modifications in measurable 'intermediate' end points or 'disease markers'. This approach may provide more accurate individual risk stratification and a better evaluation of the efficacy of a given treatment in preventing or modifying the course of target organ damage. This may represent a valuable and affordable strategy in clinical practice allowing the evaluation of both patient prognosis and the effectiveness of antihypertensive treatment over time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tocci et al. (2007) conducted a review in Hypertension and cardiovascular risk. Monitoring intermediate endpoints or disease markers was evaluated. Monitoring intermediate endpoints or disease markers in hypertension may provide more accurate individual risk stratification and better evaluation of treatment efficacy over time.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: