In this paper, I offer a reconstruction of Ghazālī's encounter with scepticism in the Deliverance from Error . For Ghazālī, I argue, radical scepticism about the possibility of knowledge ensues from intellectualist assumptions about the nature of justification. On the reading that I will propose, Ghazālī holds that foundational knowledge can only be justified via actions that lead to transformative experiences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reza Hadisi (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: