Key result
Sacubitril/valsartan cuts CV death or HF hospitalization ~31% vs. RASi, regardless of early eGFR decline.
Why the study?
Whether transient changes in kidney function after transitioning to sacubitril/valsartan portend adverse outcomes or influence long-term treatment benefits was unknown.
Does an initial moderate eGFR decline during transition to sacubitril/valsartan attenuate its long-term cardiovascular benefits compared to RASi in patients with heart failure?
Observational (n=12,761)
Double-blind
Randomized (in original trials)
Yes
Does an initial moderate eGFR decline during transition to sacubitril/valsartan attenuate its long-term cardiovascular benefits compared to RASi in patients with heart failure?
Hazard Ratio: 0.69 (95% CI 0.53–0.9)
Absolute Event Rate: 9.7% vs 14.24%
Moderate eGFR decline during transition to sacubitril/valsartan is common and partially reversible, and it does not attenuate the long-term cardiovascular benefits of the therapy in heart failure patients.
Moderate early eGFR decline should not deter sacubitril/valsartan use; supports benefit consistency but leaves open need for dedicated prospective confirmation.
Some patients with heart failure may experience transient changes in kidney function upon transition to sacubitril/valsartan. Whether such changes portend adverse outcomes or influence long-term treatment benefits with sacubitril/valsartan continuation is unknown. This investigation aimed to evaluate the association between the occurrence of moderate estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline (>15%) after initial exposure to sacubitril/valsartan and subsequent cardiovascular outcomes and its treatment benefits in PARADIGM-HF and PARAGON-HF. In sequential run-in phases, patients were titrated to enalapril 10 mg twice daily and then sacubitril/valsartan 97 mg/103 mg twice daily (in PARADIGM-HF) or valsartan 80 mg twice daily and then sacubitril/valsartan 49 mg/51 mg twice daily (in PARAGON-HF). Among randomized participants, 11% in PARADIGM-HF and 10% in PARAGON-HF experienced eGFR decline (>15%) during sacubitril/valsartan run-in. eGFR partially recovered (from nadir to postrandomization week 16) regardless of sacubitril/valsartan continuation or switch to renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASi) postrandomization. Initial eGFR decline was not consistently associated with clinical outcomes in either trial. Treatment benefits of sacubitril/valsartan vs RASi on primary outcomes were similar irrespective of run-in eGFR decline in PARADIGM-HF (eGFR decline, HR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.53-0.90; and no eGFR decline, HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.73-0.88; Pinteraction = 0.32) and PARAGON-HF (eGFR decline, rate ratio [RR]: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.52-1.36 and no eGFR decline, RR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.75-1.02, Pinteraction = 0.92). The treatment effect of sacubitril/valsartan remained consistent across a range of eGFR declines. Moderate eGFR decline when transitioning from RASi to sacubitril/valsartan is not consistently associated with adverse outcomes, and its long-term benefits are retained in heart failure across a broad range of eGFR declines. Early eGFR changes should not deter continuation of sacubitril/valsartan or stall uptitration. (Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 Compared to Valsartan, on Morbidity and Mortality in Heart Failure Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction [PARAGON-HF]; NCT01920711; Prospective Comparison of Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitors with Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure [PARADIGM-HF]; NCT01035255)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chatur et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Heart failure (reduced and preserved ejection fraction) (n=12,761). Sacubitril/valsartan vs. Enalapril or valsartan was evaluated on Cardiovascular death or first heart failure hospitalization among patients with >15% eGFR decline during run-in (PARADIGM-HF) (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.53-0.90). Sacubitril/valsartan consistently reduced the risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization compared to renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, irrespective of whether patients experienced a moderate early decline in eGFR.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: