Key result
APOE ε2 and ε4 alleles were not associated with 8-year cognitive change in cognitively normal adults aged 20 to 72 years, providing no evidence for antagonistic pleiotropy.
Why the study?
Does APOE genotype affect 8-year cognitive change in cognitively normal community-dwelling adults?
Cohort (n=2,013)
Does APOE genotype affect 8-year cognitive change in cognitively normal community-dwelling adults?
In cognitively normal adults, APOE ε2 and ε4 alleles do not exhibit antagonistic pleiotropy in relation to cognitive change between ages 20 and 72.
No support for APOE testing in cognitive assessment before age 72; leaves open effects in older adults or longer follow-up.
We examined whether the apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 allele was associated with cognitive benefits in young adulthood and whether it reversed to confer cognitive deficits in later life ("antagonistic pleiotropy") in the absence of dementia-related neuropathology. We also tested whether the ε2 allele was associated with disadvantages in early adulthood but offered protection against cognitive decline in early old age. Eight-year cognitive change was assessed in 2,013 cognitively normal community-dwelling adults aged 20-24, 40-44, or 60-64 years at baseline. Although cognitive decline was associated with age, multilevel models contrasting the ε2 and ε4 alleles provided no evidence that the APOE genotype was related to cognitive change in any of the age groups. The findings suggest that in the absence of clinically salient dementia pathology, APOE ε2 and ε4 alleles do not exhibit antagonistic pleiotropy in relation to cognition between the ages of 20 and 72 years.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bunce et al. (2013) conducted a cohort in Cognitively normal (n=2,013). APOE genotype (ε2 and ε4 alleles) was evaluated on 8-year cognitive change. APOE ε2 and ε4 alleles were not associated with 8-year cognitive change in cognitively normal adults aged 20 to 72 years, providing no evidence for antagonistic pleiotropy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: