Key result
Biatrial ablation during mitral valve surgery achieves ~69% freedom from persistent AF at 12 months.
Why the study?
In patients with persistent AF and chronic severe mitral valve regurgitation, cardioversion success and sinus rhythm maintenance are poor, but concomitant AF ablation during MV surgery may improve outcomes.
Does concomitant biatrial surgical ablation during mitral valve surgery improve maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with long-standing persistent AF and severe mitral regurgitation?
Cohort (n=62)
No
Does concomitant biatrial surgical ablation during mitral valve surgery improve maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with long-standing persistent AF and severe mitral regurgitation?
Concomitant biatrial surgical ablation during mitral valve surgery in patients with long-standing persistent AF achieves sinus rhythm in nearly 70% of patients at 12 months.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support concomitant biatrial ablation during mitral valve surgery; leaves open randomized confirmation of benefit.
Background:In patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic severe mitral valve (MV) regurgitation, the success rate of cardioversion and long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm is poor. Concomitant AF ablation during MV surgery may improve outcomes. We report short- and medium-term results in patients undergoing concomitant AF ablation during MV surgery.Methods:This was a retrospective study of all consecutive patients with long-standing persistent AF who underwent MV surgery for severe MV regurgitation with concomitant biatrial surgical ablation (biatrial modified Cox-maze IV with completion of the full lesion set) between June 2015 and June 2018. Patients were followed at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Data from 24-hour Holter monitoring, baseline clinical parameters, complications, and AF recurrence were collected.Results:A total of 62 patients with severe mitral regurgitation and long-standing persistent AF underwent MV surgery with concomitant AF ablation. A standardized energy source (bipolar radiofrequency plus cryoablation) was used in all cases. The mean age was 70 ± 11 years; 32 (51.6%) were female, and the mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 2.7 ± 1. At 12 months, sinus rhythm was documented in 43 (69.4%) patients on 24-hour Holter monitoring; 88.4% of those in sinus rhythm at follow-up demonstrated atrial contractility on echocardiography. Pacemaker implantation was required in 5 (8.1%) patients, and cerebrovascular events occurred in 3 (4.8%). Meanwhile, two patients (3.2%) required re-exploration for bleeding, but none needed re-intervention on the MV.Conclusions:Biatrial surgical AF ablation is a safe and effective adjunct in patients with long-standing persistent AF undergoing concomitant MV surgery and may be beneficial in the long term for maintaining a normal rhythm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aktuerk et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation and severe mitral valve regurgitation (n=62). Concomitant biatrial surgical ablation (modified Cox-maze IV) was evaluated on Freedom from atrial fibrillation recurrence at 12 months (95% CI 58.8-81.8). Concomitant biatrial surgical ablation during mitral valve surgery in patients with long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation achieved a 69.4% freedom from atrial fibrillation recurrence at 12 months.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: