Mitral valve surgery plus radiofrequency Maze ablation resulted in a higher rate of sinus rhythm conversion at 1 year compared to surgery plus intensive rhythm control (75% vs 39%; p=0.030).
RCT (n=49)
Single-blind
Does mitral valve surgery plus biatrial modified radiofrequency Maze procedure improve sinus rhythm restoration in patients with atrial fibrillation of more than 6 months duration undergoing mitral valve surgery?
Concomitant radiofrequency Maze ablation during mitral valve surgery significantly increases the rate of sinus rhythm restoration at 1 year compared to an intensive rhythm control strategy alone.
Absolute Event Rate: 75% vs 39%
p-value: p=0.030
OBJECTIVE: Prospective randomised study comparing patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) of more than 6 months duration after mitral valve surgery plus biatrial modified radiofrequency Maze procedure using Medtronic Cardioblate System (Cardioblate group, n=24) vs mitral valve surgery plus intensive rhythm control strategy (control group, n=25). METHODS: Patients were blinded to randomisation. Preoperatively, at discharge, and at 3-month and 1-year follow-up, echocardiography, quality of life assessments and ECGs were done. In both groups, sinus rhythm (SR) restoration was attempted by intra- and postoperative DC cardioversion and class III antiarrhythmic medication. All patients received warfarin. Amiodarone and warfarin was considered for discontinuation after 3 months in SR, 24-h Holter or event monitor excluding AF. RESULTS: Both groups underwent mitral valve replacement or repair (Cardioblate vs control: 16:8 vs 10:15), had similar gender (male: 33% vs 56%), age (66+/-8 years vs 68+/-9 years), additional aortic valve replacement (7 vs 6 patients), tricuspid annuloplasty (13 vs 13 patients), and CABG (10 vs 16 patients). There was 0% operative mortality, 0% postoperative cerebrovascular accidents, but 2 late deaths in the control group. At discharge, 3- and 12-month follow-up, more patients in the Cardioblate group returned to normal SR compared to control (29%, 57% and 75% vs 20%, 43% and 39%; p=0.030). Return of functional atrial contraction in patients in SR at 1 year was comparable between groups (63% vs 89%, NS), and more likely in non-rheumatic pathology and preoperative AF of shorter duration. The effectiveness of atrial contraction was 36+/-14% vs 43+/-18% of transmitral flow and there was no difference between groups. Amiodarone treatment decreased more in Cardioblate group over time (92%, 55% and 29% vs 52%, 52% and 21%; p=0.003), whereas warfarin decrease was comparable (100%, 100% and 71% vs 100%, 95% and 82%; NS). CONCLUSIONS: Radiofrequency Maze ablation additional to mitral valve surgery resulted in a higher SR conversion rate (75%), despite control group treatment with intensive rhythm control strategy having a higher SR conversion rate (39%) compared to literature (approximately 25%). Maze ablation resulted in normalisation of atrial function in 63% of patients converted to SR.
Oppell et al. (Tue,) conducted a rct in Atrial fibrillation of more than 6 months duration requiring mitral valve surgery (n=49). Mitral valve surgery plus biatrial modified radiofrequency Maze procedure vs. Mitral valve surgery plus intensive rhythm control strategy was evaluated on Return to normal sinus rhythm at 12 months (p=0.030). Mitral valve surgery plus radiofrequency Maze ablation resulted in a higher rate of sinus rhythm conversion at 1 year compared to surgery plus intensive rhythm control (75% vs 39%; p=0.030).