Key result
Systematic review protocol outlines planned evaluation of antithrombotic regimens in females with symptomatic PAD.
Why the study?
Indications for more intensive antithrombotic therapy in females with symptomatic PAD remain unclear because females are under-represented in RCTs and newer antithrombotic therapies have shown sex-differential effects.
Do different antithrombotic regimens reduce arterial thromboembolic events compared to monoantiplatelet therapy in females with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease?
Systematic Review
Do different antithrombotic regimens reduce arterial thromboembolic events compared to monoantiplatelet therapy in females with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease?
This protocol outlines a planned systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify the rates of arterial thromboembolic and bleeding events with different antithrombotic regimens specifically in females with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease.
Protocol only, no results yet; leaves open whether sex-specific antithrombotic regimens improve outcomes in symptomatic PAD.
INTRODUCTION: Patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) are at increased risk for systemic arterial thromboembolic events. Females represent a unique subset of patients with PAD, who differ from males in important ways: they have smaller diameter vessels, undergo lower extremity bypass less frequently and experience higher rates of graft occlusion, amputation and mortality than males. Females also trend towards higher rates of major coronary events and cardiovascular mortality. Current guidelines recommend monoantiplatelet therapy (MAPT) for secondary prevention in patients with symptomatic PAD. However, indications for more intensive antithrombotic therapy in this cohort-especially among females who are frequently under-represented in randomised controlled trials (RCTs)-remain unclear. As newer antithrombotic therapies emerge, some RCTs have demonstrated differential effects in females versus males. A systematic review is needed to quantify the rates of arterial thromboembolic and bleeding events with different antithrombotic regimens in females with symptomatic PAD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials for published RCTs that include females with symptomatic PAD and compare full dose anticoagulation±antiplatelet therapy, dual pathway inhibition or dual antiplatelet therapy with MAPT. Title, abstract and full-text screening will be conducted in duplicate by three reviewers. Authors will be contacted to obtain sex-stratified outcomes as needed. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Data will be extracted by independent reviewers and confirmed by a second reviewer. Quantitative synthesis will be conducted using Review Manager (RevMan) V.5 for applicable outcomes data. Planned subgroup analysis by PAD severity, vascular intervention and indication for antithrombotics will be conducted where data permits. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is waived as the study does not involve primary data collection. This review will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and for presentation at national and international scientific meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This protocol was registered with the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (ID# CRD42020196933).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Strauss et al. (2021) conducted a systematic review in Symptomatic lower extremity peripheral arterial disease. Antithrombotic regimens (full dose anticoagulation, dual pathway inhibition, or dual antiplatelet therapy) vs. Monoantiplatelet therapy (MAPT) was evaluated on Coprimary efficacy outcomes: primary limb outcome (major above ankle amputation) and primary CV outcome (composite of CV death, MI, and stroke). This paper is a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating antithrombotic regimens in females with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease, and thus contains no clinical results.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: