Key result
Intense insulin treatment after acute myocardial infarction in diabetic patients yielded an estimated cost per life-year gained of Euro 16,900 and Euro 24,100 per quality-adjusted life-year gained.
Why the study?
Does intense insulin treatment improve cost-effectiveness (cost per life-year and QALY gained) compared to standard antidiabetic therapy in patients with diabetes mellitus and acute myocardial infarction?
RCT (n=620)
randomized
Does intense insulin treatment improve cost-effectiveness (cost per life-year and QALY gained) compared to standard antidiabetic therapy in patients with diabetes mellitus and acute myocardial infarction?
Intense insulin treatment after acute myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes mellitus demonstrates an acceptable level of cost-effectiveness.
Acceptable costs per life-year and QALY may support intense insulin post-MI in diabetes; leaves open relevance with modern therapies.
AIMS: The aim of the present analysis was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of intense insulin treatment after acute myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes mellitus based on the results of the Diabetes Mellitus Insulin Glucose Infusion in Acute Myocardial Infarction (DIGAMI) study. In this study 620 patients with diabetes mellitus and acute myocardial infarction were randomized to intense insulin treatment (insulin group) or to serve as controls given standard antidiabetic therapy. Mortality was significantly reduced in the insulin group. METHODS AND RESULTS: The cost-effectiveness ratio was estimated as the incremental cost per life-year and quality-adjusted life-year gained of intense insulin treatment. The incremental costs were estimated as the difference in health care costs and indirect costs (labour production) during the first year of follow-up plus the future costs of increased survival. The life-years gained were based on the 5-year long-term follow-up experience and an assumed annual 20% mortality risk for all patients thereafter. The health care costs were Euro 975 higher in the insulin group during the first year of follow-up, mainly due to a longer period of initial hospitalization related to the institution of multidose insulin. The estimated discounted gain in life-years of the insulin treatment was 0.94 years without and 0.66 with quality of life adjustment, respectively. The cost per life-year gained by intense insulin treatment was Euro 16 900 and the cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained was Euro 24 100. Thus the estimated cost-effectiveness ratios were relatively low. CONCLUSION: The results of the DIGAMI study indicate that intense insulin treatment after an acute myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes mellitus has an acceptable level of cost-effectiveness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bjorn Almbrand (2000) conducted an RCT in diabetes mellitus and acute myocardial infarction (n=620). intense insulin treatment vs. standard antidiabetic therapy was evaluated on incremental cost per life-year and quality-adjusted life-year gained. Intense insulin treatment after acute myocardial infarction in diabetic patients yielded an estimated cost per life-year gained of Euro 16,900 and Euro 24,100 per quality-adjusted life-year gained.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from European Heart Journal