Key result
Catheter ablation for AF in patients with ASD occluders achieved 77.7% freedom from AF, with no significant difference in AF recurrence between septal and device puncture (RR 1.18; 95% CI 0.35-4.00).
Why the study?
Transseptal puncture is challenging in patients with prior percutaneous ASD occluder, warranting evaluation of the safety and efficacy of AF catheter ablation in this population.
Is catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation safe and effective in patients with a prior percutaneous atrial septal defect occluder?
Meta-Analysis (n=64)
Is catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation safe and effective in patients with a prior percutaneous atrial septal defect occluder?
Catheter ablation for AF in patients with prior percutaneous ASD closure devices is feasible and safe, with a 100% transseptal puncture success rate and favorable long-term freedom from AF.
Supports feasibility of AF ablation post-ASD occluder; extends small observational data but leaves open need for RCTs.
INTRODUCTION: Transseptal puncture (TSP) is challenging in patients with prior percutaneous atrial septal defect (ASD) occluder. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with percutaneous ASD occluder. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Medline, Embase, Ovid, and Cochrane for studies reporting results of AF ablation (freedom from AF, fluoroscopy/procedure time, and complications) in patients with percutaneous ASD occluders. RESULTS: Three studies with a total of 64 patients met inclusion criteria. The success rate of TSP was 100%. All patients (but one) underwent TSP under fluoroscopic and intracardiac echocardiography guidance. Freedom from AF was achieved in 77.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 65.7-86.3) patients. In the subgroup analysis, comparing septal versus device puncture, no significant difference in recurrence of AF was observed (23.07% vs. 16.66%; risk ratio: 1.18; 95% CI: 0.35-4.00; p = .79, respectively). The total fluoroscopy time was not significantly different in patients with TSP via native septum or device (43.50 vs. 70.67 min; p = .44), total procedural time was significantly longer with TSP via the closure device (237.3 vs. 180 min; p = .004) compared with the native septum. There were no device dislodgement or residual interatrial shunt during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Catheter ablation for AF in patients with prior percutaneous ASD closure device is feasible and safe with favorable long-term outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Garg et al. (2020) conducted a meta-analysis in Atrial fibrillation in patients with percutaneous ASD occluder (n=64). Transseptal puncture via native septum vs. Transseptal puncture via device was evaluated on Recurrence of AF (RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.35-4.00, p=.79). Catheter ablation for AF in patients with ASD occluders achieved 77.7% freedom from AF, with no significant difference in AF recurrence between septal and device puncture (RR 1.18; 95% CI 0.35-4.00).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: