Why the study?
Does alpha-1 adrenoreceptor subtype blockade improve functional recovery and reduce calcium overload in isolated rat hearts subjected to ischemia-reperfusion?
Does alpha-1 adrenoreceptor subtype blockade improve functional recovery and reduce calcium overload in isolated rat hearts subjected to ischemia-reperfusion?
In isolated rat hearts, alpha-1B blockade reduces calcium overload during ischemia-reperfusion, whereas alpha-1A blockade improves functional recovery via calcium-independent mechanisms.
Alpha-1 subtype blockade effects in rat hearts remain hypothesis-generating; leaves open differential mechanisms for human ischemia-reperfusion injury.
To clarify the roles of subclasses of alpha 1-adrenoreceptors in ischemic-reperfused myocardium, we compared the effect of the nonselective alpha 1-blocker bunazosin with that of the alpha 1A-blocker WB4101 and the alpha 1B-blocker chlorethylclonidine (CEC) in isolated rat hearts. After 30 min of preperfusion, Langendorff-perfused hearts were subjected to 25 min of global ischemia followed by 30 min of reperfusion. Hearts were randomly divided into 4 groups, with one of the following substances being added to the perfusate: buffer alone (control), 10(-6) mol/L bunazosin, 10(-7) mol/L WB4101, or 10(-7) mol/L CEC. Bunazosin had a negative inotropic effect and preserved the postischemic ATP content, reduced the postischemic increase in intracellular Na+ content and then enhanced postreperfusion recovery of creatine phosphate. Bunazosin also reduced myocardial 45Ca2+ uptake during reperfusion (control 5.2 vs bunazosin 2.5 mumol/g dry weight of tissue (dwt), p < 0.01). However, the recovery of left ventricular developed pressure (DP) was not improved when bunazosin was added to the perfusate during reperfusion. WB4101 had neither a negative inotropic nor an energy-sparing effect, but it improved the recovery of DP (control 43% vs WB4101 56% of preischemic value, p < 0.05) with no reduction in myocardial 45Ca2+ uptake. CEC had a negative inotropic and energy-sparing effect and then reduced myocardial 45Ca2+ uptake (CEC 3.1 mumol/g dwt, p < 0.05), but it did not improve the recovery of DP. These results suggest that the preischemic administration of an alpha 1B-adrenoreceptor subtype blocker protected ischemic-reperfused myocardium via reduction of Ca2+ overload, whereas the selective blockade of the alpha 1A-adrenoreceptor subtype reduced myocardial damage via mechanism(s) other than Ca2+ metabolism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shinmura et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: