Key result
Diastolic blood pressure variability predicted cardiovascular mortality at all ages (adjHR 1.16; 95% CI 1.08-1.26), while systolic variability predicted it only in adults <50 years (adjHR 1.72).
Why the study?
Limited and conflicting evidence exists regarding the relative prognostic importance of systolic and diastolic 24-hour blood pressure variability, and whether their association with cardiovascular mortality is age dependent.
Does short-term systolic and diastolic blood pressure variability predict cardiovascular mortality differently across age groups in untreated hypertensive subjects?
Cohort (n=9,154)
Does short-term systolic and diastolic blood pressure variability predict cardiovascular mortality differently across age groups in untreated hypertensive subjects?
Effect estimate: adjHR 1.16 (95% CI 1.08-1.26)
Diastolic blood pressure variability predicts cardiovascular mortality across all ages, while systolic variability is a particularly strong predictor in younger adults (<50 years).
May inform age-specific risk stratification in untreated hypertension; leaves open whether variability-targeted interventions improve outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Twenty-four-hour blood pressure variability (BPV) is independently related to cardiovascular outcomes, but limited and conflicting evidence is available on the relative prognostic importance of systolic and diastolic BPV. The aim of this study was to verify the hypothesis that the association of systolic and diastolic blood pressure variability over 24 h with cardiovascular mortality in untreated subjects is affected by age. DESIGN AND METHODS: The study included 9154 untreated individuals assessed for hypertension between 1982 and 2002 in the frame of the Dublin Outcome Study, in which 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was obtained (age 54.1 ± 14.3 years, 47% males). The association of short-term systolic and diastolic blood pressure variability with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in the entire sample and separately in younger and older age subgroups was assessed over a median follow-up period of 6.3 years. RESULTS: Diastolic BPV was directly and independently related to cardiovascular mortality (adjusted hazard ratio (adjHR) for daytime standard deviation 1.16 (95% confidence interval 1.08-1.26)) with no significant differences among age groups. Conversely, systolic BPV was independently associated with cardiovascular mortality only in younger (<50 years) subjects (adjHR for daytime standard deviation 1.72 (95% confidence interval 1.33-2.23)), superseding the predictive value of diastolic BPV in this group. CONCLUSIONS: Diastolic short-term BPV independently predicts cardiovascular mortality in hypertensive subjects at all ages, while systolic BPV seems a particularly strong predictor in young adults. If confirmed, these findings might improve the understanding of the prognostic value of BPV, with new perspectives for its possible clinical application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bilo et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Hypertension (n=9,154). Blood pressure variability (systolic and diastolic) was evaluated on Cardiovascular mortality (adjHR 1.16, 95% CI 1.08-1.26). Diastolic blood pressure variability predicted cardiovascular mortality at all ages (adjHR 1.16; 95% CI 1.08-1.26), while systolic variability predicted it only in adults <50 years (adjHR 1.72).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: