Key result
Diastolic blood pressure variability is linked to ~15% higher CV mortality across all ages.
Why the study?
Conflicting evidence exists on the relative prognostic importance of systolic and diastolic 24-hour blood pressure variability for cardiovascular mortality, and the effect of age on these associations is unclear.
Does short-term systolic and diastolic blood pressure variability predict cardiovascular mortality in untreated individuals assessed for hypertension?
Cohort (n=10,500)
Does short-term systolic and diastolic blood pressure variability predict cardiovascular mortality in untreated individuals assessed for hypertension?
Diastolic blood pressure variability predicts cardiovascular mortality across all ages, whereas systolic variability is a strong predictor specifically in younger adults.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Age modifies systolic versus diastolic BPV prognostic value for CV mortality in untreated patients; leaves open differential risk stratification by age.
Objective: 24-hour blood pressure variability (BPV) is independently related to cardiovascular outcomes, but conflicting evidence is available on the relative prognostic importance of systolic and diastolic BPV. Aim of this study was to verify the hypothesis that the association of systolic and diastolic blood pressure variability over 24 hours with cardiovascular mortality in untreated subjects is affected by age. Design and method: 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was obtained in 10,500 untreated individuals assessed for hypertension in the frame of the Dublin Outcome Study (age 54.4 ± 14.5 years, 47% males) followed up over a median time of 5.4 years. The association of short-term systolic and diastolic blood pressure variability with cardiovascular deaths (N = 498) was assessed in the entire sample and separately in younger and older age subgroups. Results: Diastolic BPV was directly and independently related to cardiovascular mortality (adjusted hazard ratio (adjHR) for 24-hour weighted standard deviation 1.15 [95% confidence interval 1.07–1.24]) and the strength of this association did not differ significantly among age groups. Conversely, systolic BPV was independently associated with cardiovascular mortality only in younger (<50 years) subjects (adjHR for 24-hour weighted standard deviation 1.68 [95% confidence interval 1.30–2.17]), superseding the predictive value of diastolic BPV in this group (Figure).Conclusions: Diastolic short-term BPV independently predicts cardiovascular mortality in hypertensive subjects at all ages, while systolic BPV seems a particularly strong predictor in young adults. If confirmed, these findings might improve the understanding of the prognostic value of BPV, with new perspectives for its possible clinical application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bilo et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in hypertension (n=10,500). 24-hour blood pressure variability was evaluated on cardiovascular mortality (adjHR 1.15, 95% CI 1.07-1.24). Diastolic blood pressure variability predicted cardiovascular mortality across all ages (adjHR 1.15; 95% CI 1.07-1.24), whereas systolic BPV was a strong predictor only in adults <50 years.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: