Key result
Multichannel esophageal ECG using a gastric feeding tube achieved heartbeat sensitivity and positive predictive value >98.5%, with significantly fewer false negative waves than surface ECG.
Why the study?
Surface ECG electrodes cause signal artifacts and skin irritation during long-term neonatal monitoring, raising the question of whether multichannel esophageal ECG qualifies for heart rate monitoring in preterm infants.
Does multichannel esophageal ECG using a gastric feeding tube improve heartbeat detection performance compared to standard surface leads in preterm infants?
Observational (n=13)
Does multichannel esophageal ECG using a gastric feeding tube improve heartbeat detection performance compared to standard surface leads in preterm infants?
Multichannel esophageal ECG integrated into a gastric feeding tube provides highly sensitive and reliable heart rate monitoring in preterm infants, potentially reducing skin irritation and alarm fatigue.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support reliable HR monitoring via feeding tube in preterm infants; leaves open randomized confirmation versus surface ECG.
OBJECTIVE: Autonomic dysregulation in preterm infants requires continuous monitoring of vital signs such as heart rate over days to months. Unfortunately, common surface electrodes are prone to electrocardiography (ECG) signal artifacts and cause serious skin irritations during long-term use. In contrast, esophageal ECG is known to be very sensitive due to the proximity of electrodes and heart and insensitive to external influences. This study addresses if multichannel esophageal ECG qualifies for heart rate monitoring in preterm infants. METHODS: We recorded esophageal leads with a multi-electrode gastric feeding tube in a clinical study with 13 neonates and compared the heartbeat detection performance with standard surface leads. A computationally simple and versatile ECG wave detection algorithm was used. RESULTS: Multichannel esophageal ECG manifested heartbeat sensitivity and positive predictive value greater than 98.5% and significant less false negative (FN) ECG waves as compared to surface ECG due to site-typical electrode motion artifacts. False positive bradycardia as indicated with more than 13 consecutive FN ECG waves was equally expectable in esophageal and surface channels. No adverse events were reported for the multi-electrode gastric feeding tube. CONCLUSION: Heart rate monitoring of preterm infants with multiple esophageal electrodes is considered as feasible and reliable. Less signal artifacts will improve the detection of bradycardia, which is crucial for immediate interventions, and reduce alarm fatigue. SIGNIFICANCE: Due to the possibility to integrate the multichannel ECG into a gastric feeding tube and meanwhile omit harmful skin electrodes, the presented system has great potential to facilitate future intensive care of preterm infants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Simmen et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Preterm infants requiring heart rate monitoring (n=13). Multichannel esophageal ECG with a multi-electrode gastric feeding tube vs. Standard surface leads was evaluated on Heartbeat detection performance (sensitivity and positive predictive value). Multichannel esophageal ECG using a gastric feeding tube achieved heartbeat sensitivity and positive predictive value >98.5%, with significantly fewer false negative waves than surface ECG.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: