Why the study?
Is transcatheter aortic valve implantation feasible and effective in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis at high risk or with contraindications for surgery?
Population
Patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis at high risk or with contraindications for surgery
Comparison
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs Conventional surgery
Design
Guideline
Follow-up
up to 2 years
Authors
Loading...
Supports TAVI in high-risk symptomatic severe AS; extends evidence to 2-year outcomes but leaves long-term durability open.
Is transcatheter aortic valve implantation feasible and effective in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis at high risk or with contraindications for surgery?
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is a promising alternative to conventional surgery for high-risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis, though careful evaluation of safety and long-term durability is required.
Vahanian et al. (2008) conducted a review in Severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs. Conventional surgery was evaluated on Haemodynamic and clinical improvement. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is a feasible technique that provides haemodynamic and clinical improvement for up to 2 years in high-risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: