Why the study?
Do biolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer reduce the composite of cardiac death, target-vessel MI, and target lesion revascularisation in patients with STEMI compared to bare metal stents?
RCT (n=1,161)
Randomly assigned
Yes
Do biolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer reduce the composite of cardiac death, target-vessel MI, and target lesion revascularisation in patients with STEMI compared to bare metal stents?
The COMFORTABLE AMI trial is designed to evaluate whether biolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer are superior to bare metal stents in patients with STEMI.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Biolimus-eluting biodegradable-polymer stents reduce MACE versus bare-metal stents in STEMI; extends DES evidence to primary PCI.
AIMS: Compared with bare metal stents (BMS), early generation drug-eluting stents (DES) reduce the risk of revascularisation in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) at the expense of an increased risk of very late stent thrombosis (ST). Durable polymer coatings for controlled drug release have been identified as a potential trigger for these late adverse events and this has led to the development of newer generation DES with durable and biodegradable polymer surface coatings with improved biocompatibility. In a recent all-comers trial, biolimus-eluting stents with a biodegradable polymer surface coating were found to reduce the risk of very late ST by 80% compared with sirolimus-eluting stents with durable polymer, which also translated into a lower risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction (MI) beyond one year. METHODS AND RESULTS: The multicentre COMFORTABLE AMI trial (NCT00962416) randomly assigned 1,161 patients to treatment with biolimus-eluting stents with biodegrable polymer and bare metal stents of otherwise identical design at 11 international sites. The primary endpoint is a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel MI and target lesion revascularisation at one year. Assuming a relative risk reduction of 40% in event rates of the primary endpoint in favour of biolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer, 1,064 patients will provide 80% power to demonstrate superiority. Clinical follow-up will be continued through five years. CONCLUSIONS: The COMFORTABLE AMI trial will determine whether biolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer are superior to bare metal stents of otherwise identical design. This is the first randomised controlled trial (RCT) investigating DES with a biodegradable polymer surface coating for drug release in the treatment of patients with STEMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Räber et al. (2012) conducted an RCT in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=1,161). Biolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer vs. Bare metal stents was evaluated on Composite of cardiac death, target-vessel MI and target lesion revascularisation at one year.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: