Key result
Deep learning classification of dynamic volume rendering videos from 4DCT cardiac angiograms accurately detected regional left ventricular wall motion abnormalities with 90.9% per-video accuracy.
Why the study?
LV wall motion abnormalities are independent indicators of adverse cardiovascular events, motivating development of a deep learning framework to detect them from dynamic volume renderings of clinical 4DCT angiograms.
Can a deep learning framework applied to dynamic volume rendering videos of 4DCT accurately detect left ventricular wall motion abnormalities compared to quantitative regional shortening and expert assessment?
Observational (n=343)
No
Can a deep learning framework applied to dynamic volume rendering videos of 4DCT accurately detect left ventricular wall motion abnormalities compared to quantitative regional shortening and expert assessment?
Effect estimate: Kappa 0.81 (95% CI 0.77-0.85)
A deep learning framework applied to highly compressed volume rendering videos of cardiac 4DCT can accurately detect regional left ventricular wall motion abnormalities, matching expert visual assessment.
May support automated LV wall motion assessment on 4DCT; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
Background: The presence of left ventricular (LV) wall motion abnormalities (WMA) is an independent indicator of adverse cardiovascular events in patients with cardiovascular diseases. We develop and evaluate the ability to detect cardiac wall motion abnormalities (WMA) from dynamic volume renderings (VR) of clinical 4D computed tomography (CT) angiograms using a deep learning (DL) framework. Methods: Three hundred forty-three ECG-gated cardiac 4DCT studies (age: 61 ± 15, 60.1% male) were retrospectively evaluated. Volume-rendering videos of the LV blood pool were generated from 6 different perspectives (i.e., six views corresponding to every 60-degree rotation around the LV long axis); resulting in 2058 unique videos. Ground-truth WMA classification for each video was performed by evaluating the extent of impaired regional shortening visible (measured in the original 4DCT data). DL classification of each video for the presence of WMA was performed by first extracting image features frame-by-frame using a pre-trained Inception network and then evaluating the set of features using a long short-term memory network. Data were split into 60% for 5-fold cross-validation and 40% for testing. Results: Volume rendering videos represent ~800-fold data compression of the 4DCT volumes. Per-video DL classification performance was high for both cross-validation (accuracy = 93.1%, sensitivity = 90.0% and specificity = 95.1%, κ: 0.86) and testing (90.9, 90.2, and 91.4% respectively, κ: 0.81). Per-study performance was also high (cross-validation: 93.7, 93.5, 93.8%, κ: 0.87; testing: 93.5, 91.9, 94.7%, κ: 0.87). By re-binning per-video results into the 6 regional views of the LV we showed DL was accurate (mean accuracy = 93.1 and 90.9% for cross-validation and testing cohort, respectively) for every region. DL classification strongly agreed (accuracy = 91.0%, κ: 0.81) with expert visual assessment. Conclusions: Dynamic volume rendering of the LV blood pool combined with DL classification can accurately detect regional WMA from cardiac CT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Left ventricular wall motion abnormalities (n=343). Deep learning classification of 4DCT volume rendering videos vs. Ground-truth quantitative regional shortening (RSCT) was evaluated on Per-video diagnostic accuracy for detecting wall motion abnormalities in the testing cohort (Kappa 0.81, 95% CI 0.77-0.85). Deep learning classification of dynamic volume rendering videos from 4DCT cardiac angiograms accurately detected regional left ventricular wall motion abnormalities with 90.9% per-video accuracy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: