Key result
Regional endocardial shortening computed from 4D CT angiography using an optimal threshold of -0.19 was interchangeable with expert visual analysis in detecting segmental left ventricular wall motion abnormalities.
Why the study?
To investigate whether endocardial regional shortening computed from 4D CT angiography can be used as a decision classifier to detect LV wall motion abnormalities.
Does endocardial regional shortening computed from 4D CT angiography (RSCT) accurately detect left ventricular segmental wall motion abnormalities compared to expert visual analysis?
Observational (n=100)
Blinded to patient health record and previous diagnosis
No
Does endocardial regional shortening computed from 4D CT angiography (RSCT) accurately detect left ventricular segmental wall motion abnormalities compared to expert visual analysis?
Effect estimate: γ -0.38% (95% CI -0.40, -0.35)
Absolute Event Rate: 90.29% vs 89.92%
Regional endocardial shortening computed from 4D CT angiography is an objective, quantitative metric that is interchangeable with expert visual analysis for detecting left ventricular wall motion abnormalities.
Supports objective quantification of LV wall motion on 4D CT; leaves open prospective outcome validation.
Purpose To investigate whether endocardial regional shortening computed from four-dimensional (4D) CT angiography (RSCT) can be used as a decision classifier to detect the presence of left ventricular (LV) wall motion abnormalities (WMAs). Materials and Methods One hundred electrocardiographically gated cardiac 4D CT studies (mean age, 59 years ± 14 [SD]; 61 male patients) conducted between April 2018 and December 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. Three experts labeled LV wall motion in each of the 16 American Heart Association (AHA) segments as normal or abnormal; they also measured peak RSCT across one heartbeat in each segment. The data set was split evenly into training and validation groups. During training, interchangeability of RSCT thresholding with experts to detect WMA was assessed using the individual equivalence index (γ), and an optimal threshold of the peak RSCT (RSCT*) that achieved maximum agreement was identified. RSCT* was then validated using the validation group, and the effect of AHA segment–specific thresholds was evaluated. Agreement was assessed using κ statistics. Results The optimal threshold, RSCT* of -0.19, when applied to all AHA segments, led to high agreement (agreement rate = 92.17%, κ = 0.82) and interchangeability with experts (γ = -2.58%). The same RSCT* also achieved high agreement in the validation group (agreement rate = 90.29%, κ = 0.76, γ = -0.38%). The use of AHA segment–specific thresholds (range: 0.16 to -0.23 across AHA segments) slightly improved agreement (1.79% increase). Conclusion RSCT thresholding was interchangeable with expert visual analysis in detecting segmental WMA from 4D CT and may be used as an objective decision classifier. Keywords: CT, Left Ventricle, Regional Endocardial Shortening, Wall Motion Abnormality Supplemental material is available for this article.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Left ventricular segmental wall motion abnormality (n=100). Regional shortening computed from 4D CT angiography (RSCT) vs. Expert visual labeling was evaluated on Interchangeability of RSCT thresholding with experts to detect WMA (individual equivalence index γ) in the validation group (γ -0.38%, 95% CI -0.40, -0.35). Regional endocardial shortening computed from 4D CT angiography using an optimal threshold of -0.19 was interchangeable with expert visual analysis in detecting segmental left ventricular wall motion abnormalities.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: