Why the study?
Does the timing of myocardial contrast echocardiography assessment predict left ventricular remodeling in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction after primary PTCA?
Does the timing of myocardial contrast echocardiography assessment predict left ventricular remodeling in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction after primary PTCA?
Assessment of microvascular integrity using myocardial contrast echocardiography 1 day after primary PTCA is optimal for predicting unfavorable left ventricular remodeling in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction.
Day-2 MCE assessment may identify post-MI remodeling risk; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
The objective of this study was to determine the optimal time to assess microvascular integrity within the risk area for myocardial infarction in order to predict unfavorable left ventricular remodeling (LVR) after successful primary coronary angioplasty. Fifty-three patients who underwent myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) just before recanalization, shortly after and 1 day (Day 2) and 3 weeks after recanalization were studied. The no- and low-reflow ratio (LR ratio) was analyzed at each stage. The wall-thinning ratio within the risk area was determined using magnetic resonance imaging performed 3-4 weeks after the recanalization. Thirteen of the 53 patients showed LVR 3-8 months after recanalization. The optimal time to predict LVR was found to be Day 2 based on the receiver operating characteristic curves. The LR ratio on Day 2 (chi2=7.39, p=0.007) and the collateral circulation before recanalization (chi2=4.57, p=0.03) were chosen as independent variables for predicting LVR. Patients with greater than 0.43 in the LR ratio on Day 2 showed a lower wall-thinning ratio (58+/-19% vs 72+/-20%, p=0.05). This study shows that the optimal time to estimate the microvascular integrity for predicting LVR is 1 day after recanalization, which is neither shortly after recanalization nor during the convalescent stage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sakuma et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: