Why the study?
Does 3D echocardiography-derived sphericity index predict left ventricular remodeling in patients with STEMI after primary PCI?
Does 3D echocardiography-derived sphericity index predict left ventricular remodeling in patients with STEMI after primary PCI?
3D echocardiography-derived sphericity index measured early after STEMI can accurately predict subsequent left ventricular remodeling at 6 months.
3D echo may detect post-STEMI remodeling; leaves open whether it improves risk stratification or outcomes versus 2D imaging.
Background: Left ventricular remodeling (LVR) after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) harbingers poor prognosis. Three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) is more accurate than 2 D echo for the assessment of left ventricle (LV) shape. We assessed LV geometry with 3D ECHO 6 months after STEMI in patients who had primary angioplasty. Materials and Methods: In this prospective study, morphological and functional analysis of LV with 3D ECHO (volumes, LVEF, 3D sphericity index [SI]) was assessed up to 7 days and 6 months in 42 STEMI patients. The LVR was considered for increase >15% of the end diastolic volume of the LV (LVEDV) 6 months after the STEMI, compared to the LVEDV up to 7 days of it. Results: Sixteen (38%) patients had LVR. 3D Echocardiographic measurements up to 7 days after the acute myocardial infarction (AMI) 1-LVEDV in ventricular remodeling group was 99.8 ± 19.1 ml and in no ventricular remodeling group was 87 ± 18.2 mL (P = 0.037); 2-LVEF was 0.48 ± 0.01 and 51 ± 0.02 (P <.001); 3D-SI was 0.41 ± 0.05 and 31 ± 0.05 (P < 0.001) II-after 6 months: 1-LVEDV in remodeling group was 114.2 ± 19.5 mL and no remodeling group was 94.2 ± 18.6 (P = 0.002); 2-LVEF was 0.58 ± 0.01 and 59 ± .01 (P = 0.003); 3D-sphericity was 0.35 ± 0.05 and 28 ± .05 (P < 0.001). Conclusion: LVR was observed in 38% of the patients 6 months after AMI. The 3D SI has been associated with occurrence of LVR and can differentiate patients with and without subsequent development of LVR accurately and early on its basis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ola et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: