Key result
Intermittent negative pressure applied to the lower leg increased blood flow velocity by an average of 44% above baseline (P < 0.001) in healthy volunteers.
Why the study?
Does intermittent negative pressure applied to the lower extremity increase foot perfusion in healthy volunteers?
RCT (n=23)
Randomized order
Does intermittent negative pressure applied to the lower extremity increase foot perfusion in healthy volunteers?
p-value: p=<0.001
Intermittent negative pressure applied to the lower limb significantly increases foot perfusion and skin blood flow in healthy volunteers.
May augment acute foot perfusion in healthy volunteers; hypothesis-generating, requiring trials in patients with vascular disease.
Intermittent negative pressure (INP) applied to the lower leg and foot may increase peripheral circulation. However, it is not clear how different patterns of INP affect macro- and microcirculation in the foot. The aim of this study was therefore to determine the effect of different patterns of negative pressure on foot perfusion in healthy volunteers. We hypothesized that short periods with INP would elicit an increase in foot perfusion compared to no negative pressure. In 23 healthy volunteers, we continuously recorded blood flow velocity in a distal foot artery, skin blood flow, heart rate, and blood pressure during application of different patterns of negative pressure (-40 mmHg) to the lower leg. Each participant had their right leg inside an airtight chamber connected to an INP generator. After a baseline period at atmospheric pressure, we applied four different 120 sec sequences with either constant negative pressure or different INP patterns, in a randomized order. The results showed corresponding fluctuations in blood flow velocity and skin blood flow throughout the INP sequences. Blood flow velocity reached a maximum at 4 sec after the onset of negative pressure (average 44% increase above baseline, P < 0.001). Skin blood flow and skin temperature increased during all INP sequences (P < 0.001). During constant negative pressure, average blood flow velocity, skin blood flow, and skin temperature decreased (P < 0.001). In conclusion, we observed increased foot perfusion in healthy volunteers after the application of INP on the lower limb.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sundby et al. (2016) conducted an RCT in Healthy volunteers (n=23). Intermittent negative pressure (INP) vs. Atmospheric pressure (baseline) and constant negative pressure was evaluated on Blood flow velocity in a distal foot artery (p=<0.001). Intermittent negative pressure applied to the lower leg increased blood flow velocity by an average of 44% above baseline (P < 0.001) in healthy volunteers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: