Key result
Flow-Mediated Slowing by VICORDER demonstrated 100% specificity and 72.7% sensitivity compared to sonographic Flow-Mediated Dilation for assessing endothelial function in pregnant women.
Why the study?
Flow-mediated dilatation is challenging to measure in routine care, and whether automated flow-mediated slowing is equivalent has not been established in pregnant women.
Does Electronic EndoCheck Flow-Mediated Slowing (FMS) accurately evaluate vascular function compared to sonographic Flow-Mediated Dilation (FMD) in pregnant women?
Cross-Sectional (n=20)
No
Does Electronic EndoCheck Flow-Mediated Slowing (FMS) accurately evaluate vascular function compared to sonographic Flow-Mediated Dilation (FMD) in pregnant women?
FMS by VICORDER is a convenient, automated method with 100% specificity and 72.7% sensitivity compared to FMD for assessing endothelial function in pregnant women.
FMS may support endothelial assessment in pregnancy; hypothesis-generating in small cross-sectional cohort and should not yet change practice.
The evaluation of endothelial function is gaining interest and importance during pregnancy, since the impaired adaptation in early pregnancy has been associated with an increased risk in preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction. To standardize the risk assessment and to implement the evaluation of vascular function in routine pregnancy care, a suitable, accurate and easy to use method is needed. Flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) of the brachial artery assessed by ultrasound is considered to be the gold standard for measuring the vascular endothelial function. The challenges of the FMD measurement have so far prevented its introduction into clinical routine. The VICORDER® device allows an automated determination of the flow-mediated slowing (FMS). The equivalence of FMD and FMS has not yet been proven in pregnant women. We collected data of 20 pregnant women randomly and consecutively while they presented for a vascular function assessment in our hospital. The gestational age at investigation was between 22 and 32 weeks of gestation, three had preexisting hypertensive pregnancy disease and three were twin pregnancies. The results for FMD or FMS below 11.3% were considered to be abnormal. Comparing FMD to FMS results in our cohort revealed a convergence in 9/9 cases, indicating normal endothelial function (specificity of 100%) and a sensitivity of 72.7%. In conclusion, we verify that the FMS measurement is a convenient, automated and operator-independent test method of endothelial function in pregnant women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lößner et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Pregnancy (n=20). Electronic EndoCheck Flow-Mediated Slowing (FMS) by VICORDER vs. Sonographic Flow-Mediated Dilation (FMD) was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of FMS compared to FMD. Flow-Mediated Slowing by VICORDER demonstrated 100% specificity and 72.7% sensitivity compared to sonographic Flow-Mediated Dilation for assessing endothelial function in pregnant women.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: