Key result
ICOSA6 4D flow MRI successfully quantified turbulence parameters in vivo, demonstrating that turbulent kinetic energy, shear stress, and turbulence production in a patient with severe aortic stenosis were at least an order of magnitude larger than in normal subjects.
Why the study?
The study aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of full Reynolds stress tensor analysis using six-directional icosahedral 4D flow MRI under physiological conditions.
Observational (n=13)
No
ICOSA6 4D flow MRI is feasible for quantifying full Reynolds stress tensor parameters under physiological pulsatile flow, successfully distinguishing elevated turbulence in severe aortic stenosis.
ICOSA6 4D flow MRI enables in vivo turbulence quantification in aortic stenosis; leaves open its clinical or prognostic utility pending validation.
Imaging hemodynamics play an important role in the diagnosis of abnormal blood flow due to vascular and valvular diseases as well as in monitoring the recovery of normal blood flow after surgical or interventional treatment. Recently, characterization of turbulent blood flow using 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been demonstrated by utilizing the changes in signal magnitude depending on intravoxel spin distribution. The imaging sequence was extended with a six-directional icosahedral (ICOSA6) flow-encoding to characterize all elements of the Reynolds stress tensor (RST) in turbulent blood flow. In the present study, we aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of full RST analysis using ICOSA6 4D flow MRI under physiological conditions. First, the turbulence analysis was performed through in vitro experiments with a physiological pulsatile flow condition. Second, a total of 12 normal subjects and one patient with severe aortic stenosis were analyzed using the same sequence. The in-vitro study showed that total turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) was less affected by the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), however, maximum principal turbulence shear stress (MPTSS) and total turbulence production (TP) had a noise-induced bias. Smaller degree of the bias was observed for TP compared to MPTSS. In-vivo study showed that the subject-variability on turbulence quantification was relatively low for the consistent scan protocol. The in vivo demonstration of the stenosis patient showed that the turbulence analysis could clearly distinguish the difference in all turbulence parameters as they were at least an order of magnitude larger than those from the normal subjects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ha et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Healthy and severe aortic stenosis (n=13). ICOSA6 4D flow MRI was evaluated on Turbulence parameters (turbulent kinetic energy, maximum principal turbulent shear stress, and turbulence production). ICOSA6 4D flow MRI successfully quantified turbulence parameters in vivo, demonstrating that turbulent kinetic energy, shear stress, and turbulence production in a patient with severe aortic stenosis were at least an order of magnitude larger than in normal subjects.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: