Key result
Radiofrequency catheter ablation within the pulmonary artery successfully eliminated symptomatic premature ventricular contractions that could not be abolished by ablation in the right ventricular outflow tract.
Why the study?
Does radiofrequency catheter ablation within the pulmonary artery eliminate idiopathic premature ventricular contractions in a patient where RVOT ablation failed?
Case Report (n=1)
No
Does radiofrequency catheter ablation within the pulmonary artery eliminate idiopathic premature ventricular contractions in a patient where RVOT ablation failed?
Idiopathic PVCs can originate from the pulmonary artery and may require ablation above the pulmonary valve when standard RVOT ablation fails.
May warrant pulmonary artery mapping after failed RVOT PVC ablation; leaves open safety and efficacy in larger cohorts.
A patient underwent radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation of symptomatic idiopathic ventricular contractions (PVCs). RF energy applications at 2 sites in the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT), where both the earliest ventricular activation and near-perfect pace mapping were obtained, did not abolish the PVC but resulted in changes in the QRS morphology of the PVC. Complete elimination of the PVC was achieved with RF energy application at a site within the pulmonary artery 13 mm above the pulmonary valve, which was greater than 20 mm away from the failed ablation sites within the RVOT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tada et al. (2005) conducted a case report in Symptomatic idiopathic premature ventricular contractions (n=1). Radiofrequency catheter ablation in the pulmonary artery vs. Radiofrequency catheter ablation in the right ventricular outflow tract was evaluated on Complete elimination of premature ventricular contractions. Radiofrequency catheter ablation within the pulmonary artery successfully eliminated symptomatic premature ventricular contractions that could not be abolished by ablation in the right ventricular outflow tract.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: