Key result
Samsung Galaxy Watch3 shows high heart rate accuracy with a ~1 bpm bias vs reference.
Why the study?
Validation and metrological characterization of wearable ECG devices are fundamental as their use expands in medicine, personal assessment, and sports.
Does the Samsung Galaxy Watch3 accurately measure heart rate and classify physical activity compared to a gold standard device in healthy subjects?
Cross-Sectional (n=30)
No
Does the Samsung Galaxy Watch3 accurately measure heart rate and classify physical activity compared to a gold standard device in healthy subjects?
Effect estimate: Bias -1 bpm (95% CI -22 to 20)
The Samsung Galaxy Watch3 provides accurate mean heart rate measurements but lacks the precision required for clinical diagnostic purposes, though it shows promise for remote monitoring and activity classification.
Limited precision advises against diagnostic use; leaves open remote monitoring potential pending larger validation studies.
Wearable devices are rapidly spreading thanks to multiple advantages. Their use is expanding in several fields, from medicine to personal assessment and sport applications. At present, more and more wearable devices acquire an electrocardiographic (ECG) signal (in correspondence to the wrist), providing potentially useful information from a diagnostic point of view, particularly in sport medicine and in rehabilitation fields. They are remarkably relevant, being perceived as a common watch and, hence, considered neither intrusive nor a cause of the so-called "white coat effect". Their validation and metrological characterization are fundamental; hence, this work aims at defining a validation protocol tested on a commercial smartwatch (Samsung Galaxy Watch3, Samsung Electronics Italia S.p.A., Milan, Italy) with respect to a gold standard device (Zephyr BioHarness 3.0, Zephyr Technology Corporation, Annapolis, MD, USA, accuracy of ±1 bpm), reporting results on 30 subjects. The metrological performance is provided, supporting final users to properly interpret the results. Moreover, machine learning and deep learning models are used to discriminate between resting and activity-related ECG signals. The results confirm the possibility of using heart rate data from wearable sensors for activity identification (best results obtained by Random Forest, with accuracy of 0.81, recall of 0.80, and precision of 0.81, even using ECG signals of limited duration, i.e., 30 s). Moreover, the effectiveness of the proposed validation protocol to evaluate measurement accuracy and precision in a wide measurement range is verified. A bias of -1 bpm and an experimental standard deviation of 11 bpm (corresponding to an experimental standard deviation of the mean of ≈0 bpm) were found for the Samsung Galaxy Watch3, indicating a good performance from a metrological point of view.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cosoli et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy individuals (n=30). Samsung Galaxy Watch3 vs. Zephyr BioHarness 3.0 was evaluated on Heart rate measurement accuracy (bias) (Bias -1 bpm, 95% CI -22 to 20). The Samsung Galaxy Watch3 demonstrated high heart rate measurement accuracy with a bias of -1 bpm compared to a reference device, though precision was limited with a standard deviation of 11 bpm.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: