Why the study?
Are claims-based definitions valid for identifying left ventricular systolic dysfunction in Medicare patients with heart failure or myocardial infarction?
Population
1072 Medicare patients with ejection fraction recorded for a heart failure or myocardial infarction…
Comparison
Thirteen claims-based definitions for systolic… vs Recorded ejection fractions (gold standard)
Design
Cohort
Authors
Loading...
High-specificity digoxin-based claims definitions may aid restricted HF/MI cohorts; leaves open substantial misclassification bias in effectiveness studies.
Are claims-based definitions valid for identifying left ventricular systolic dysfunction in Medicare patients with heart failure or myocardial infarction?
Claims-based definitions for systolic dysfunction have excellent specificity and good PPV but low sensitivity, making them useful for cohort identification by restriction but prone to misclassification bias.
Li et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: