Why the study?
Is the APOE gene associated with an increased risk of diabetic nephropathy in East Asian populations?
Is the APOE gene associated with an increased risk of diabetic nephropathy in East Asian populations?
The APOE e2 allele is associated with a nearly twofold increased risk of diabetic nephropathy in East Asian populations, whereas the e4 allele shows heterogeneous, region-specific effects.
Background: Several studies have examined the association between DN and the APOE gene, but the results have been inconsistent. Objective: Determine whether APOE is a risk factor for DN by a meta-analysis. Methods: A meta-analysis was performed using all findings of 16 similar case–control studies in East Asian to evaluate the effect of APOE as a risk factor for DN. Several electronic databases were searched for relevant articles up to 2009. After data collection, a meta-analysis was used to assess heterogeneity, combine results and evaluate variations by using software STATA SE 9.0. Publication bias was examined by the Egger’s linear regression test and fail-safe number. Results: The meta-analysis showed that the e2 allele almost doubled the risk of DN in East Asians (pooled ORs [95% CI]: 1.85 [1.49-2.29]). In contrast, studies relating the e4 allele to DN risk were very heterogeneous and the pooled ORs were 1.05 [95% CI: 0.72-1.52]. In the subgroup meta-analysis, e4 was substantially related to an increased risk for DN in studies conducted in China (pooled ORs [95% CI]: 1.51 [1.11-2.06]), which was different from previous results. However, the higher risk of DN associated with e4 was not found in Japanese or Korean populations (pooled ORs [95% CI]: 0.46 [0.27-0.80] and 0.58 [0.09-3.55], respectively). Conclusion: The e2 allele conferred a higher risk of DN in East Asians, and no significant result was obtained with the e4 allele.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Feng et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: