Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: The mechanisms of drug resistance associated with advanced, hormone-independent prostate carcinoma are poorly understood. The human prostate carcinoma PC-3 cell line, derived from a metastatic tumor and lacking androgen receptors, represents a useful model to investigate drug resistance. METHODS: The effects of oncostatin M (OM), antiinterleukin-6 (IL-6) treatment, or interference with the gp130-mediated signaling on etoposide- or cisplatin-mediated cytotoxicity were investigated. RESULTS: Both endogenous and exogenous IL-6 and exogenous OM up-regulated cell growth and enhanced resistance of PC-3 tumor cells to both etoposide and cisplatin. The influence of IL-6 is controlled by treating PC-3 tumor cells with anti-IL-6 neutralizing antibody and, more efficiently, by a mutated IL-6, Sant7. Sant7 has a high affinity binding to the IL-6 receptor-alpha (IL-6Ralpha) subunit, but does not bind to the signaling subunit gp130; therefore, it behaves as a receptor antagonist. Both IL-6- and OM-mediated effects are inhibited by the treatment of PC-3 with an antisense oligodeoxynucleotide against gp130, the protein kinase inhibitor genistein (GNS), or the monoterpene perillic acid (PA), a posttranslational inhibitor of p21ras isoprenylation. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the protective roles in drug sensitivity of IL-6 and OM through signaling of the common chain gp130 and, most likely, a downstream ras-dependent pathway in PC-3 tumor cells. These findings suggest the potential clinical application of anticytokine therapy or interference with gp130 signaling in the treatment of drug resistant prostate carcinoma.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Borsellino et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: