Why the study?
Early recognition of left atrial and left ventricular remodelling may improve the prognosis of patients with hypertension.
Does hypertension alter left heart coupling indices and left atrial/ventricular remodelling prior to the development of LV hypertrophy?
Does hypertension alter left heart coupling indices and left atrial/ventricular remodelling prior to the development of LV hypertrophy?
In patients with hypertension, adaptive left heart remodelling occurs prior to LV hypertrophy and can be detected by a reduced LV/LA volume ratio, reduced indexed LA reservoir function, and increased relative LV wall thickness.
May identify early hypertensive remodelling on TTE; leaves open whether parameters improve risk stratification or outcomes.
Background Early recognition of left atrial (LA) and left ventricular (LV) remodelling may improve prognosis of patients with hypertension. Methods Left heart coupling indices were studied to investigate the adaptive effect of hypertension on cardiac remodelling. The ratio of LV to LA volumes was measured at selected phases of a cardiac cycle using computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography and transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE). A group of 180 patients was divided into Group 1 (no hypertension) and Group 2 (hypertension). Volume ratios were measured in diastasis by both CT and TTE: LV dias and LA dias . Using TTE, volumes were measured at end-diastole (LV ED and LA min )), and end-systole (LV ES and LA max ). LA function and LV/LA ratios were analysed at: LV ED /LA max , LV dias /LA dias , LV ED /LA min , LV ES /LA min . Results There were no differences between the age groups, LV ED , and LV mass index. Compared to Group 1, Group 2 had bigger mean LV wall thickness (0.90±0.16 cm vs 0.83±0.14 cm; p=0.006), increased relative wall thickness ratio (0.39±0.09 vs 0.35±0.008, p=0.004), and more frequent concentric LV remodelling (31 vs 12, p=0.020). LA volumes were bigger in Group 2 for LA max , LA dias , and LA min . All LV/LA volume ratios were lower in Group 2 compared to Group 1 (LV ED /LA max 1.55±0.56 vs 1.79±0.69, p=0.010; LV ED /LA min 3.56±2.00 vs 4.59±2.56, p=0.003; LV ES /LA min 1.36±0.77, p=0.005, LV dias /LA dias (TTE) 1.75±0.61 vs 2.24±1.24, p<0.001, LV dias /LA dias (CT) 1.49±0.23 vs 1.69±0.41, p<0.001). LA reservoir function and conduit function indexed by E/e’ ratio was lower in Group 2. Combined TTE parameters of relative wall thickness >40, LV dias /LA dias ≤1.81, and indexed by E/e’ LA reservoir function ≤0.068 had the highest discriminate power to differential patients from Group 1 and Group 2 (area under the curve 0.737). Conclusions In hypertension, prior to the development of LV hypertrophy, adaptive remodelling is based on reduced LV/LA volume ratio, reduced indexed reservoir LA function, and increased relative LV wall thickness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lange et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: