Why the study?
The gold-standard conductance technology for pressure-volume relations is rarely used in children, prompting investigation into 3D-echocardiography combined with mini pressure-wire in univentricular hearts.
Does 3D-echocardiography combined with a mini pressure-wire provide a feasible and comparable alternative to conductance technology for assessing pressure-volume relations in patients with univentricular hearts?
Does 3D-echocardiography combined with a mini pressure-wire provide a feasible and comparable alternative to conductance technology for assessing pressure-volume relations in patients with univentricular hearts?
3D-echocardiography combined with a mini pressure-wire is a highly feasible, less invasive alternative to conductance technology for assessing ventricular function in univentricular hearts, though absolute values are not perfectly interchangeable.
3DE-PVR offers higher feasibility than conductance in univentricular hearts; leaves open whether moderate agreement supports interchangeable clinical use.
Objectives The gold standard to obtain pressure-volume relations (PVR) of the heart, the conductance technology (PVR Cond ), is rarely used in children. PVR can also be obtained by 3D-echocardiography volume data combined with simultaneously measured pressure data by a mini pressure-wire (PVR 3DE ). We sought to investigate the feasibility of both methods in patients with univentricular hearts and to compare them, including hemodynamic changes. Methods We studied 19 patients (age 2–29 years). PVR 3DE and PVR Cond were assessed under baseline conditions and stimulation with dobutamine. Results Obtaining PVR 3DE was successful in all patients. Obtaining PVR Cond was possible in 15 patients during baseline (79%) and in 12 patients under dobutamine (63%). Both methods showed that end-systolic elastance (Ees) and arterial elastance (Ea) increased under dobutamine and that Tau showed a statistically significant decrease. Intraclass correlation (95% confidence interval) showed moderate to good agreement between methods: Ees: 0.873 (0.711–0.945), Ea: 0.709 (0.336–0.873), Tau: 0.867 (0.697–0.942). Bland-Altman analyses showed an acceptable bias with wider limits of agreement: Ees: 1.63 mmHg/ml (-3.83–7.08 mmHg/ml), Ea: 0.53 mmHg/ml (-5.23–6.28 mmHg/ml), Tau: -0,76 ms (-10.73–9.21 ms). Conclusion Changes of PVR-specific parameters under dobutamine stimulation were reflected in the same way by both methods. However, the absolute values for these parameters could vary between methods and, therefore, methods are not interchangeable. Obtaining PVR 3DE in a single ventricle was easier, faster and more successful than PVR Cond . PVR 3DE provides a promising and needed alternative to the conductance technology for the assessment of cardiac function in univentricular hearts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Linden et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: