Key result
Noninvasive Doppler estimation of pulmonary vascular resistance showed excellent agreement with invasive cardiac catheterization across a wide range of values in patients with congenital shunt lesions.
Why the study?
Does Doppler echocardiography accurately estimate pulmonary vascular resistance compared to invasive cardiac catheterization in patients with congenital heart disease and left-to-right shunts?
Observational (n=63)
Does Doppler echocardiography accurately estimate pulmonary vascular resistance compared to invasive cardiac catheterization in patients with congenital heart disease and left-to-right shunts?
Doppler echocardiography provides a reliable, noninvasive method for estimating pulmonary vascular resistance in patients with congenital left-to-right shunts, potentially reducing the need for invasive catheterization.
Supports noninvasive Doppler PVR estimation in congenital shunts; leaves open prospective validation before reducing catheterization.
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) is a crucial parameter in the management of patients with left-to-right shunt lesions. Cardiac catheterization (Cath) is the gold standard test to assess PVR (PVRcath ), but it is invasive and hence, risky in children with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). A noninvasive tool to assess PVR is desirable. Ratio of tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRV) and time-velocity integral of right ventricular outflow tract (TVIRVOT ) by Doppler was previously shown to be a reliable noninvasive method for estimation of PVR in acquired PAH. METHODS: Peak TR velocity and TVIRVOT were recorded from 63 prospective patients with various congenital shunt lesions. Subsequently, the patients were subjected to cath in less than 2 hours. The patients were subdivided into four subsets based on age and pulmonary arterial mean pressure (PAMP). A regression equation was developed for calculation of PVR from TRV/TVIRVOT (PVREcho ) which was indexed for BSA (PVRIEcho ). Bland-Altman analysis was done for agreement between PVRIcath and PVRIEcho . Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to test the identity of the two methods and also the applicability of PVRIEcho across a wide range of Wood units. RESULTS: Receiver operating characteristic curve plotted between the two methods showed good identity. Bland-Altman analysis showed excellent agreement between the two methods with negligible bias. ROC curves showed that PVRIEcho was accurate in distinguishing different cutoff values of PVR in each of the 4 groups. CONCLUSION: Noninvasive Doppler estimation of PVR is reliable in patients with shunt lesions over a wide range of PVR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhyravavajhala et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Congenital heart disease with left-to-right shunt lesions (n=63). Doppler-based measurement of pulmonary vascular resistance (TRV/TVIRVOT) vs. Cardiac catheterization was evaluated on Agreement between Doppler-estimated and catheterization-derived pulmonary vascular resistance index. Noninvasive Doppler estimation of pulmonary vascular resistance showed excellent agreement with invasive cardiac catheterization across a wide range of values in patients with congenital shunt lesions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: