Key result
The Doppler echocardiographic TRV/TVI(RVOT) ratio strongly correlated with invasive pulmonary vascular resistance (r=0.929), offering 77% sensitivity and 81% specificity for PVR >2 Wood units.
Why the study?
Determining pulmonary vascular resistance requires right-heart catheterization with its associated disadvantages, and a reliable noninvasive method was unavailable.
Does the Doppler echocardiographic ratio of TRV/TVI(RVOT) reliably estimate pulmonary vascular resistance compared to right-heart catheterization?
Does the Doppler echocardiographic ratio of TRV/TVI(RVOT) reliably estimate pulmonary vascular resistance compared to right-heart catheterization?
The Doppler echocardiographic ratio of TRV/TVI(RVOT) provides a reliable, noninvasive method to estimate pulmonary vascular resistance, correlating strongly with invasive right-heart catheterization measurements.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support noninvasive PVR estimation at bedside; leaves open prospective validation against catheterization in broader cohorts.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to test whether the ratio of peak tricuspid regurgitant velocity (TRV, ms) to the right ventricular outflow tract time-velocity integral (TVI(RVOT), cm) obtained by Doppler echocardiography (TRV/TVI(RVOT)) provides a clinically reliable method to determine pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vascular resistance is an important hemodynamic variable used in the management of patients with cardiovascular and pulmonary disease. Right-heart catheterization, with its associated disadvantages, is required to determine PVR. However, a reliable noninvasive method is unavailable. METHODS: Simultaneous Doppler echocardiographic examination and right-heart catheterization were performed in 44 patients. The ratio of TRV/TVI(RVOT) was then correlated with invasive PVR measurements using regression analysis. An equation was modeled to calculate PVR in Wood units (WU) using echocardiography, and the results were compared with invasive PVR measurements using the Bland-Altman analysis. Using receiver-operating characteristics curve analysis, a cutoff value for the Doppler equation was generated to determine PVR >2WU. RESULTS: As calculated by Doppler echocardiography, TRV/TVI(RVOT) correlated well (r = 0.929, 95% confidence interval 0.87 to 0.96) with invasive PVR measurements. The Bland-Altman analysis between PVR obtained invasively and that by echocardiography, using the equation: PVR = TRV/TVI(RVOT) x 10 + 0.16, showed satisfactory limits of agreement (mean 0 +/- 0.41). A TRV/TVI(RVOT) cutoff value of 0.175 had a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 81% to determine PVR >2WU. CONCLUSIONS: Doppler echocardiography may provide a reliable, noninvasive method to determine PVR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abbas et al. (2003) studied this question. The Doppler echocardiographic TRV/TVI(RVOT) ratio strongly correlated with invasive pulmonary vascular resistance (r=0.929), offering 77% sensitivity and 81% specificity for PVR >2 Wood units.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: