Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Previous investigations related to the nature of hierarchical tasks (Gagne, and others, 1961, 1962; Merrill, 1965) have not drawn a clear distinction between the hierarchical structure of a task and a hierarchical presentation of the task. A hierarchical structure is perceived by a logical analysis which demonstrates that concepts and principles of the higher levels are combinations, reorganizations, elaborations, and applications of the concepts and principles at the lower levels (Gagne, 1965). A hierarchical presentation results when lowest level is presented to the learner first, then the next level is presented, etc. It was demonstrated (Merrill, 1965) that in learning a hierarchically structured imaginary science Ss (Group V) who received only a summary of each lesson (or level) prior to a correction/review test section performed as well on a three-week retention test as Ss who received considerably more detailed program instruction prior to the test section. When total time for learning and retention was considered, Ss in this summary-review condition learned the task in half the time required for the other Ss.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Merrill et al. (1966) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: