Why the study?
Does sitagliptin improve coronary flow reserve in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and stable coronary artery disease?
Does sitagliptin improve coronary flow reserve in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and stable coronary artery disease?
In patients with relatively well-controlled type 2 diabetes and stable coronary artery disease, 24 weeks of sitagliptin therapy did not improve coronary flow reserve, left ventricular function, or peripheral endothelial function compared to voglibose.
Sitagliptin does not improve CFR in T2DM with stable CAD; challenges assumptions of DPP-4 inhibitor microvascular benefit.
BACKGROUND: The present study was conducted to assess the cardiovascular effects of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) on coronary flow reserve (CFR), left ventricular (LV) function and endothelial function of the peripheral artery by comparison with those of α-glucosidase inhibitors (αGI) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS AND RESULTS: We randomly assigned 30 patients with T2DM and CAD to receive either sitagliptin or voglibose, and 28 patients (age 69±9 years, 75% male, hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] 6.62±0.48%) completed the study (14 in each group). CFR and LV function, assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and endothelial function, assessed by reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry (RH-PAT), were measured at baseline and 24 weeks after treatment. Clinical and laboratory parameters, including HbA1c level, plasma active glucagon-like peptide-1 concentrations, and biomarkers of inflammation, were unchanged in both groups after 24 weeks of treatment. CFR were unchanged in both the αGI group (3.01±0.98 at baseline and 3.06±0.8 after treatment, P=NS) and the DPP4i group (4.29±2.04 at baseline and 3.63±1.31 after treatment, P=NS), with no interaction effect. LV functional parameters and the reactive hyperemia index also remained unchanged after the 24-week treatment. CONCLUSIONS: DPP4i did not improve CFR, LV function or endothelial function of the peripheral artery in patients with relatively well-controlled T2DM and CAD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moriwaki et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: