Why the study?
CKD is common in HF and associated with higher mortality, but management is challenging due to drug-induced electrolyte changes, diuretic resistance, device infections, and exclusion of advanced CKD from major trials.
How should heart failure be managed in patients with concurrent chronic kidney disease across different CKD stages?
How should heart failure be managed in patients with concurrent chronic kidney disease across different CKD stages?
While evidence supports standard HFrEF therapies in CKD stages 1-3, there is a significant evidence gap and potential for harm in applying these therapies to patients with CKD stages 4-5 or on dialysis.
Warrants stage-specific caution applying HF therapies in advanced CKD; leaves open randomized evidence beyond stage 3.
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) in heart failure (HF) patients is common, present in 49%, and is associated with a higher mortality hazard ratio [2.34 (95% confidence interval 2.20-2.50); P < 0.001] and multiple hospital admissions. The management of HF in CKD can be challenging due to drug-induced electrolyte and creatinine changes, resistance to diuretics and infections related to device therapy. Evidence for improvement in mortality and HF hospitalizations exists in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in Stage 3 CKD patients from randomized controlled trials of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist therapy but not in dialysis patients, where higher doses can cause hyperkalaemia. Evidence of improvement in cardiovascular death and HF hospitalizations has emerged with the angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor ivabradine and more recently with sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitors in HFrEF patients with CKD Stages 1-3. However, these studies have excluded CKD Stages 4 and 5 patients. Evidence for β-blocker therapy exists in CKD Stages 1-3 and separately in haemodialysis patients. Cardiac resynchronization therapy reduces HF hospitalizations and mortality in patients with CKD Stages 1-3 but has not been shown to do so in CKD Stages 4 and 5 or dialysis patients. Internal cardioverter and defibrillator therapy in HFrEF patients has been shown to be beneficial in CKD 3 patients but not in dialysis patients, where it is associated with high rates of infection. For HFpEF patients with CKD, therapy is symptomatic, as there is no proven therapy for improvement in survival or hospitalizations. HF patients with end-stage kidney disease with fluid overload may benefit from peritoneal dialysis. A multidisciplinary, personalized approach has been associated with better care and improved patient satisfaction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Banerjee et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: