Why the study?
Suboptimal adherence to antihypertensive medication is a major challenge for blood pressure control, but limited studies exist on this issue, especially in Korea.
Older age, longer disease duration, and comorbidities like diabetes and ischemic heart disease are associated with better adherence to antihypertensive medications in Korean patients, highlighting the need for targeted interventions in younger, healthier patients.
May inform targeted adherence support for younger patients; leaves open causal mechanisms and generalizability.
Suboptimal adherence to antihypertensive medication is a major challenge in controlling blood pressure. However, limited studies exist on suboptimal adherence to hypertension, especially in Korea. This study investigates factors associated with suboptimal adherence, including non-treatment and non-adherence. Study populations were collected from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) from 2007 to 2021. Participants were classified into three groups based on treatment and adherence to antihypertensive medication using a self-reported questionnaire. Multivariable adjusted logistic regression analysis was performed using KNHANES data to investigate associations for suboptimal adherence with covariates. In KNHANES, the adherent, non-adherent, and non-treatment groups consisted of 13,831 (92.8 %), 460 (3.1 %), and 612 (4.1 %) subjects, respectively. In the adjusted model, age, hypertension diagnosis duration, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and high hemoglobin levels were associated with receiving treatment. Older age, longer hypertension diagnosis duration, comorbid diabetes mellitus, and ischemic heart disease were associated with adherence. This study showed the characteristics of non-adherent and non-treatment hypertensive patient groups in Korea. Based on this study, further individualized health interventions are required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jo et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: