Why the study?
Spatial localization of ventricular abnormal potentials can help identify ablation targets during substrate-guided mapping and ablation, motivating an automatic approach for their reliable detection in intracardiac electrograms.
Does an automatic SVM-based classifier using time-scale and time-domain features accurately detect ventricular abnormal potentials in intracardiac electrograms from patients with post-ischemic ventricular tachycardia?
Does an automatic SVM-based classifier using time-scale and time-domain features accurately detect ventricular abnormal potentials in intracardiac electrograms from patients with post-ischemic ventricular tachycardia?
An automated SVM-based algorithm using wavelet transform features can accurately identify ventricular abnormal potentials, potentially optimizing substrate-guided ablation procedures for ventricular tachycardia.
Ventricular abnormal potentials are low-amplitude electrical signals that appear in intracardiac electrograms during a QRS or with an unpredictable delay with respect to it. Their spatial localization can be exploited by cardiologists for the identification of the ablation targets in substrate-guided mapping and ablation procedures. In this work, an automatic approach for a reliable detection of such potentials in intracardiac electrograms is proposed. To this aim, 86 intracardiac electrograms from five patients with post-ischemic ventricular tachycardia, acquired by the CARTO3 System, were retrospectively annotated by an expert cardiologist, to be used for a supervised classifier training and test. The automatic detection was based on a non-linear denoising followed by a time-scale decomposition based on the continuous wavelet transform. Then, different morphological features were extracted from both the time-scale domain and the time domain, and used to feed a support vector machine trained to discriminate between physiological and abnormal potentials. The recognition accuracy exceeded 93%, paving the way to further developments and more extensive studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baldazzi et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: