Examines the Carbon Intensity Indicator for training ships, suggesting regulatory inclusion for better decarbonization.
This study examines the feasibility and validity of applying the Carbon Intensity Indicator (CII) to training ships, which currently occupy a regulatory blind spot within the International Maritime Organization’s (IMO) decarbonization framework. While previous research often used Ro-Ro passenger ships as a reference, those models fail to reflect the unique structural and operational profiles of training ships.To address this, this research analyzed empirical technical data—including the Length-to-Beam ratio, Block Coefficient, Gross Tonnage, and annual sailing distance—from three distinct training ships. The analysis demonstrates high structural similarity between training ships and cruise ships, thereby establishing a new reference vessel category.The Attained CII was derived using both pre- and post-revision calculation methodologies. A comparative analysis with the Required CII (incorporating the Z-factor) revealed that the vessels’ ratings significantly improved from “E” under pre-revision criteria to “A” or “B” under the revised formula.These findings suggest a strong potential for including educational and public-purpose vessels in future IMO frameworks. Ultimately, this study provides foundational implications for designing carbon management systems tailored to special-purpose vessels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
HyoGeun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: