The Carbon Intensity Indicator (CII) of ships is evaluated annually; however, this aggregated calculation may conceal substantial variation in carbon intensity across different voyage types. To investigate how voyage parameters affect CII outcomes, this study presents a five-year (2020–2024) voyage-level empirical analysis of a Suezmax crude oil tanker. The findings indicate that laden voyages with high waiting time (>40% of voyage days) exhibit the poorest CII performance, averaging 4.84 gCO₂/dwt·nm, well above the 2024 required threshold of 3.30 gCO₂/dwt · nm. Speed reduction in both laden and ballast conditions produces meaningful but bounded fuel savings well below cubic-law expectations, and the vessel's rating trajectory was shaped less by operational change than by the tightening of the regulatory threshold itself. The findings underline the importance of voyage-level analysis as a complement to annual reporting and indicate that ship operators should consider voyage characteristics and idle time alongside speed optimization, particularly as reduction factors continue to escalate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Doymuş et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: