Why the study?
Little data exist concerning population trends in the incidence of hospitalizations for myocarditis and subsequent prognosis.
The incidence of myocarditis in Sweden increased from 2000 to 2014, predominantly in young men, and while 1-year mortality declined over time, it remained fourfold higher than in the general population.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Myocarditis cases warrant closer post-diagnosis surveillance; extends incidence trends but leaves open causal factors and targeted interventions.
Investigate trends in myocarditis incidence and prognosis in Sweden during 2000-2014. Little data exist concerning population-trends in incidence of hospitalizations for myocarditis and subsequent prognosis. Linking Swedish National Patient and Cause of Death Registers, we identified individuals ≥ 16 years with first-time diagnosis of myocarditis during 2000-2014. Reference population, matched for age and birth year (n = 16,622) was selected from Swedish Total Population Register. Among the 8 679 cases (75% men, 64% < 50 years), incidence rate/100,000 inhabitants rose from 6.3 to 8.6 per 100,000, mostly in men and those < 50 years. Incident heart failure/dilated cardiomyopathy occurred in 6.2% within 1 year after index hospitalization and in 10.2% during 2000-2014, predominantly in those ≥ 50 years (12.1% within 1 year, 20.8% during 2000-2014). In all 8.1% died within 1 year, 0.9% (< 50 years) and 20.8% (≥ 50 years). Hazard ratios (adjusted for age, sex) for 1-year mortality comparing cases and controls were 4.00 (95% confidence interval 1.37-11.70), 4.48 (2.57-7.82), 4.57 (3.31-6.31) and 3.93 (3.39-4.57) for individuals aged < 30, 30 to < 50, 50 to < 70, and ≥ 70 years, respectively. The incidence of myocarditis during 2000-2014 increased, predominantly in men < 50 years. One-year mortality was low, but fourfold higher compared with reference population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fu et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: