This review summarizes the technical aspects, strengths, and weaknesses of current noninvasive and invasive ambulatory ECG monitoring methods for diagnosing rhythm and conduction disturbances.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Clinicians may reference this synthesis when selecting ambulatory ECG monitors; leaves open comparative effectiveness data for prospective trials.
The review considers the main characteristics and diagnostic capabilities of current noninvasive and invasive methods of ambulatory electrocardiogram monitoring used in diagnosis of cardiac rhythm and conduction disturbances. Strength and weaknesses of different methods of long-term electrocardiogram monitoring are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
E. V. Pervova (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: