Key result
Modern ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring methods, such as patch monitors and implantable loop recorders, provide higher diagnostic yields for detecting arrhythmias and syncope compared to standard Holter monitoring.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review provides a clinical framework for selecting the appropriate ambulatory ECG monitoring method based on symptom frequency and patient risk profile to optimize the diagnosis of arrhythmias and syncope.
The review presents the clinical characteristics and comparative data of application of modern non-invasive and invasive methods of ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring in the diagnosis of arrhythmias and cardiac conduction. The properties of each of the methods of extended electrocardiographic monitoring, the effectiveness of their application and tactics for improving the diagnosis of arrhythmias and syncope during the process of diagnosis are presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
E. V. Pervova (2017) conducted a review in Cardiac arrhythmias and syncope. Ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring methods vs. Standard Holter monitoring was evaluated. Modern ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring methods, such as patch monitors and implantable loop recorders, provide higher diagnostic yields for detecting arrhythmias and syncope compared to standard Holter monitoring.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: