Key result
Ambulatory ECG monitors, particularly continuous-loop recorders, are highly effective for diagnosing patients with palpitations.
Why the study?
The efficacy of various ambulatory electrocardiographic monitors for diagnosing arrhythmia-related disorders and their clinical use needed evaluation.
Are ambulatory electrocardiographic monitors effective for diagnosing arrhythmia-related disorders in clinical practice?
Population
Patients with arrhythmia-related disorders including palpitations, syncope, and risk for sudden arrhythmic death
Comparison
Various ambulatory electrocardiographic monitors including transtelephonic continuous-loop event recorders
Design
Systematic review of studies since 1988 with minimal bias and clinical relevance
Authors
Loading...
May support event recorders for palpitations evaluation; leaves open prospective validation and comparative trials.
Systematic Review
Are ambulatory electrocardiographic monitors effective for diagnosing arrhythmia-related disorders in clinical practice?
Ambulatory electrocardiographic monitors, particularly continuous-loop event recorders, are highly effective for diagnosing symptomatic arrhythmias like palpitations, though less so for syncope.
Peter Zimetbaum (1999) conducted a systematic review in Arrhythmia-related disorders. Ambulatory electrocardiographic monitors was evaluated on Diagnosis of arrhythmia-related disorders. Ambulatory electrocardiographic monitors, particularly transtelephonic continuous-loop event recorders, are highly effective for establishing a diagnosis in patients with palpitations.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: