Why the study?
Most laboratories use immunoassays to measure plasma aldosterone concentration, but the diagnostic cutoff for seated saline suppression testing using immunoassay is not known.
What is the optimal diagnostic cutoff for seated saline suppression testing when plasma aldosterone concentration is measured by chemiluminescence immunoassay compared to HPLC-MS/MS in patients evaluated for primary aldosteronism?
What is the optimal diagnostic cutoff for seated saline suppression testing when plasma aldosterone concentration is measured by chemiluminescence immunoassay compared to HPLC-MS/MS in patients evaluated for primary aldosteronism?
When using chemiluminescence immunoassay for seated saline suppression testing in primary aldosteronism, a higher diagnostic cutoff (171-217 pmol/L) is required compared to HPLC-MS/MS.
May warrant assay-specific higher cutoffs for saline suppression testing; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: In primary aldosteronism (PA), excessive, autonomous secretion of aldosterone is not suppressed by salt loading or fludrocortisone. For seated saline suppression testing (SSST), the recommended diagnostic cutoff 4-hour plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) measured by high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS is 162 pmol/L. Most diagnostic laboratories, however, use immunoassays to measure PAC. The cutoff for SSST using immunoassay is not known. We hypothesized that the cutoff is different between the assays. METHODS: We analyzed 80 of the 87 SSST tests that were performed during our recent study defining the HPLC-MS/MS cutoff. PA was confirmed in 65 by positive fludrocortisone suppression testing (FST) and/or lateralization on adrenal venous sampling and excluded in 15 by negative FST. PAC was measured by a chemiluminescence immunoassay (PACIA) in the SSST samples using the DiaSorin Liaison XL analyzer, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was performed to identify the PACIA cutoff. RESULTS: ROC revealed good performance (area under the curve = 0.893; P < .001) of 4-hour postsaline PACIA for diagnosis of PA and an optimal diagnostic cutoff of 171 pmol/L, with sensitivity and specificity of 95.4% and 80.0%, respectively. A higher cutoff of 217 pmol/L improved specificity (86.7%) with lower sensitivity (86.2%). PACIA measurements strongly correlated with PAC measured by HPLC-MS (r = 0.94, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: A higher diagnostic cutoff for SSST should be employed when PAC is measured by immunoassay rather than HPLC-MS/MS. The results suggest that (i) PA can be excluded if 4-hour PACIA is less than 171 pmol/L, and (ii) PA is highly likely if the PACIA is greater than 217 pmol/L by chemiluminescence immunoassay. A gray zone exists between the cutoffs of 171 and 217 pmol/L, likely reflecting a lower specificity of immunoassay.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thuzar et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: