Why the study?
The benefits of cardio-oncologic rehabilitation programmes on cardiorespiratory fitness and cancer fatigue during anthracycline-based chemotherapies with supervised exercise training, compared to PA advice and tracking only, were unknown.
Does supervised exercise training improve peak VO2, fatigue, or quality of life in patients undergoing anthracycline therapy compared to physical activity advice and tracking alone?
Does supervised exercise training improve peak VO2, fatigue, or quality of life in patients undergoing anthracycline therapy compared to physical activity advice and tracking alone?
In physically active cancer patients, providing physical activity advice and an activity tracker is as effective as supervised exercise training for maintaining peak VO2, fatigue, and quality of life during anthracycline therapy.
Supervised exercise adds no benefit over activity advice with tracking during anthracycline therapy; confirms simpler interventions suffice in active patients.
It is unknown what the benefits of cardio-oncologic rehabilitation programmes on cardiorespiratory fitness and cancer fatigue during anthracycline-based chemotherapies (AC) are with supervised exercise training (ET), compared to PA advice and tracking only. Patients with breast cancer or lymphoma were recruited from four cancer centres and randomly assigned to three months supervised ET during (EXduringAC) or after (EXpostAC) AC. All patients were counselled on physical activity (PA) and PA was objectively measured with an activity tracker. Primary endpoints were peak VO 2 , fatigue and quality of life (QoL) after AC (AC-end) and at follow-up (3 months after completion of AC). Secondary endpoints were daily PA and daily steps during AC and follow-up phase, which were compared between days with and without centre-based training sessions. All analyses were performed by linear mixed models. Fifty-seven patients (median [1st and 3rd quartiles] age 47 years [38, 57 years]; 95 % women) consented to participate, of whom data from 51 patients were available. Despite the fact that PA on days with centre-based training sessions was 28 (95 % confidence interval 24–32) min higher with 4382 (3995–4768) more steps, neither PA nor steps differed between groups in neither AC nor follow-up phase, nor were there between group differences in peak VO 2, QoL or fatigue at any time point. In physically active patients with cancer, PA advice and using an activity tracker was equally effective on changes in peak VO 2 , fatigue, or QoL as enrolling in centre-based ET performed during or after AC. NCT03850171, February 21, 2019.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schneider et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: