PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 22, 2010Journal of Hypertension379 citations

Invasive validation of a new oscillometric device (Arteriograph) for measuring augmentation index, central blood pressure and aortic pulse wave velocity

View Full Paper
IHIván HorváthÁNÁdám NémethZLZsófia Lenkey

Structured PICO

Does the Arteriograph oscillometric device accurately measure aortic augmentation index, central systolic blood pressure, and aortic pulse wave velocity compared to invasive measurements in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization?

P
Population
Patients undergoing cardiac catheterization (n=55 for SBPao, n=22 for PWVao, n=16 for Aix)
I
Intervention
Noninvasive measurement of aortic augmentation index (Aix), central systolic blood pressure (SBPao), and aortic pulse wave velocity (PWVao) using an oscillometric device (Arteriograph)
C
Comparator
Invasive measurement during cardiac catheterization
O
Outcome
Correlation and agreement between noninvasive and invasive measurements of Aix, SBPao, and PWVaosurrogate

The Arteriograph oscillometric device provides accurate, noninvasive measurements of central blood pressure, augmentation index, and pulse wave velocity that strongly correlate with invasive catheterization values.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The importance of measuring aortic pulse wave velocity (PWVao), aortic augmentation index (Aix) and central systolic blood pressure (SBPao) has been shown under different clinical conditions; however, information on these parameters is hard to obtain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a new, easily applicable oscillometric device (Arteriograph), determining these parameters simultaneously, against invasive measurements. METHODS: Aortic Aix, SBPao and PWVao were measured invasively during cardiac catheterization in 16, 55 and 22 cases, respectively, and compared with the values measured by the Arteriograph. RESULTS: We found strong correlation between the invasively measured aortic Aix and the oscillometrically measured brachial Aix on either beat-to-beat or mean value per patient basis (r = 0.9, P < 0.001; r = 0.94, P < 0.001), which allowed the noninvasive calculation of the aortic Aix without using generalized transfer function. Similarly strong correlation (r = 0.95, P < 0.001) was found between the invasively measured and the noninvasively calculated central SBPao; furthermore, the BHS assessment of the paired differences fulfilled the 'B' grading. The PWVao values measured invasively and by Arteriograph were 9.41 ± 1.8 m/s and 9.46 ± 1.8 m/s, respectively (mean ± SD); furthermore, the Pearson's correlation was 0.91 (P < 0.001). The limits of agreement were 11.4% for aortic Aix and 1.59 m/s for PWVao. CONCLUSION: Aix, SBPao and PWVao, measured oscillometrically, showed strong correlation with the invasively obtained values. The observed limits of agreement are encouragingly low for accepting the method for clinical use. Our results suggest that the PWVao values, measured by Arteriograph, are close to the true aortic PWV, determined invasively.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Horváth et al. (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d36061c2cbcb15c5df2fdhttps://doi.org/10.1097/hjh.0b013e32833c8a1a
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper