Key result
The Vasotens oscillometric BP system showed satisfactory accordance with the SphygmoCor device for central systolic BP (r=0.98, mean difference 2.9 mmHg) and PWV (r=0.85).
Why the study?
Does the Vasotens oscillometric ambulatory BP monitoring system accurately measure central BP, aortic augmentation index, and PWV compared to the standard SphygmoCor device in individuals?
Cross-Sectional (n=99)
Does the Vasotens oscillometric ambulatory BP monitoring system accurately measure central BP, aortic augmentation index, and PWV compared to the standard SphygmoCor device in individuals?
Mean Difference: 2.9
The integration of Vasotens oscillometric technology into an ambulatory BP monitoring system provides accurate measurements of central BP and arterial stiffness indices compared to the standard tonometric method.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
May enable routine central BP and PWV assessment via ABPM; leaves open outcome validation before practice adoption.
Orlov et al. (2014) reported a cross-sectional. Vasotens technology in BPLab ambulatory BP monitoring system vs. SphygmoCor device was evaluated on central systolic BP (mean difference 2.9±3.5 mmHg). The Vasotens oscillometric BP system showed satisfactory accordance with the SphygmoCor device for central systolic BP (r=0.98, mean difference 2.9 mmHg) and PWV (r=0.85).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: