Why the study?
Cardiac sarcoidosis is potentially fatal when unrecognized or inadequately treated, prompting an updated review on strategies to increase clinical recognition and immunosuppressive treatment options.
Cardiac sarcoidosis requires histological diagnosis via biopsy, often guided by imaging, and frequently necessitates corticosteroid-sparing agents due to refractoriness to standard prednisone therapy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant early corticosteroid-sparing agents in refractory cardiac sarcoidosis; leaves open optimal regimens for prospective trials.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is a potentially fatal condition when unrecognized or not treated adequately. The purpose of this review is to provide new strategies to increase clinical recognition of CS and to present an updated overview of the immunosuppressive treatments using most recent data published in the last 18 months. RECENT FINDINGS: CS is an increasingly recognized pathology, and its diagnostic is made 20 times more often in the last two decades. Recent studies have shown that imaging alone usually lacks specificity to distinguish CS from other inflammatory cardiomyopathies. However, imaging can be used to increase significantly diagnostic yield of extracardiac and cardiac biopsy. Recent reviews have also demonstrated that nearly 25% of patients will be refractory to standard treatment with prednisone and that combined treatment with a corticosteroid-sparing agent is often necessary for a period that remains undetermined. SUMMARY: CS is a complex pathology that should always require a biopsy attempt to have a histological proven diagnosis before starting immunosuppressive therapy consisting of corticosteroids with or without a corticosteroid-sparing agent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lemay et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: