Why the study?
Does the blood pressure lowering response to imidapril vary according to ACE genotype in Japanese hypertensive patients?
Does the blood pressure lowering response to imidapril vary according to ACE genotype in Japanese hypertensive patients?
The blood pressure lowering response to imidapril in hypertensive patients may be partially determined by ACE genotype, with a trend toward greater diastolic blood pressure reduction in the II genotype.
May support ACE I/D genotyping to predict imidapril response; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Insertion (I)/deletion (D) polymorphism of the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) gene has been reported to be involved in various cardiovascular diseases. We investigated prospectively whether the response to the ACE inhibitor imidapril varied according to the ACE genotype or plasma ACE activity in Japanese hypertensive patients. The study population consisted of 57 hypertensive patients. After a 4-week observation period, imidapril was administered at a dose of 5 mg/day and blood pressure was measured every 2 weeks for 6 weeks. The plasma ACE activity in patients with the DD or ID genotype was significantly higher than that in patients with the II genotype. Neither the reduction nor the percent reduction in systolic blood pressure was significantly different between patients with either the DD or ID genotype and patients with the II genotype (DD or ID v II, 18.8 +/- 2.4 v 20.2 +/- 3.3 mm Hg; P = NS, 10.9 +/- 1.4 v 11.7 +/- 1.9%; P = NS, respectively). However, both the reduction and the percent reduction in diastolic blood pressure tended to be higher in patients with the II genotype (DD or ID v II, 7.9 +/- 1.2 v 12.4 +/- 2.2 mm Hg; P = .0669, 8.1 +/- 1.2 v 12.4 +/- 2.2%; P = .0569, respectively). The reduction in diastolic blood pressure was inversely correlated with plasma ACE activity (r = 0.301, P = .0253). In conclusion, the response to imidapril in hypertensive patients is determined at least in part by the ACE genotype.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nobuyuki Ohmichi (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: